Therefore the issue of the homophobia-as-repression hypothesis are highlighted: only if few homophobes tend to be meaningful homosexual, subsequently homosexuality cannot describe a lot; if many homophobes are homosexual, subsequently homophobia can be useless at convincing rest one is directly.
As such, it will arrive as little shock that some present research discovers no proof because of this homophobia-as-repressed-homosexuality hypothesis. MacInnis & Hodson (2013) looked for to examine whether any connect is present between a measure of implicit intimate appeal and direct homophobia in heterosexuals. In order to do this, the authors utilized an implicit connection job (IAT) modified to sexual interest: a job which members have to classify photos as male/female and keywords as intimately attractive/unattractive, as well as the increase of which they do very should let you know some thing concerning cognitive organization between your two. I’m cautious with the interpretations of IATs for several explanations, but I’ll assume for the moment that these types of a test does without a doubt kind of measure what they expect. Participants were furthermore asked about their own direct intimate destinations to men and women, and their attitudes towards gay/lesbian and heterosexual populations. In total, their unique sample symbolized 237 Canadian undergraduates (85 guys).
When I would expect, the IAT effects just correlated reasonably with specific measures of intimate appeal (r = .37 for men, roentgen = .15 for females). Continue reading